Greg Schafer wrote: > Sorry, you're wrong and clearly not getting it. Meanwhile, it's apparent > you've turned into a Ryan nut hugger, just like the rest of the CLFS > crowd. God help LFS! > > I honestly don't care anymore. LFS is a project without direction, without > leadership and apparently has lost sight of what made it popular back in > the day. Good luck fellas!
If you had some solid technical proof (think demonstrable example) to show why this method is not a correct approach, instead of just "your're wrong", or spouting insults, your feedback would be worth much more. As it is, this just sounds like a personal attack because I'm not using your method and/or because I'm using work from your 'nemesis'. I have had good success with this build, and although I have not yet verified itwith any sort of comparison analysis (part of the reason why I hadn't committed anywhere) it will be done before it goes into the book. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
