Matt Burgess wrote: > This passes a boot test with no changes required to the bootscripts > or fstab. Maybe I'm misunderstanding Bruce's and Bryan's comments in > the ticket, but this to me suggests that Udev >= 176 doesn't require > a devtmpfs mounted on /dev
That's very strange, given this commit included in -176: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;h=220893b3cbdbf8932f95c44811b169a8f0d33939 (see udev-node.c), which removes all the mknod() calls. If you don't have a devtmpfs mounted at /dev (but rather just a tmpfs), I don't see how anything will work anymore. :-) > (note that I do have devtmpfs support in the kernel, but I've added > nothing to fstab). Did you edit the udev script to use devtmpfs instead of tmpfs, possibly?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
