----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeremy Huntwork" <[email protected]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Udev-177 & Kmod-3 WIP patch


> On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> >
> > I'd be curious what's in /proc/mounts as well, but eh whatever.
>
> Is there a reason LFS doesn't just symlink /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts?
>
> JH
> -- 

In some cases, the symlink case may fail when that work with a real file
/etc/mtab.
In 2009, coreutils-8.0beta rm/one-file-system test fail with the symlink
from /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-10/msg00278.html

the example that fail was
mount --bind /dev/shm/tmp10767 a/b
...
umount /dev/shm/tmp10767
umount: /dev/shm/tmp10767: not mounted

I don't know if behavior has changed since 2009 (running kernel was probably
2.6.24 or 2.6.16)
I read that Fedora moved the symlink from /proc/self/mount to /etc/mtab,
this is required for systemd.

Gilles

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to