Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 25/12/2012 00:41, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> >> I'm not quite ready to give up on E2fsprogs-1.42.6 because I think it >> only is a problem in jhalfs. AFAICT right now, the test actually >> passes, but leaves an unwanted background process running. I'm not >> sure we want the -k in the make check. I get: >> >> 125 tests succeeded 0 tests failed >> >> Perhaps if we kill the debug fs in jhalfs when we finish the checks, >> that would clean things up.
> I think I have found where the problem is: > from the tests log: > [...] > ../../tests/f_mmp/script: line 25: ps: command not found > f_mmp: disable MMP with tune2fs after e2fsck killed: ok > [...] > And ps is not found because procps is built after e2fsprogs... Yes. Found that yesterday and moving procps fixes the problem. The test (and the gzip problem I had earlier) are both OK now. > If I understand correctly the script, > ps is used to find debugfs PID, in order to kill it. > If the PID is not found, debugfs is not killed. > The funny thing is that if debugfs is not killed, the test should not pass. > Maybe a bug report to upstream? I don't think so. This is quite specific to LFS. > Anyway, procps should be added as a dependency of e2fsprogs, > and built before. > This should not be a problem since according to the `dependencies' > chapter, all procps's dependencies are built in chapter 5. I'll fix it either tonight or tomorrow. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
