Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 01/03/2014 23:31, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 01/03/2014 21:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It sounds like we need to add a check for libgmp on the host. Perhaps
>>>>>> libmpfr and libmpc also.
>>>>
>>>>> It is the .la files, which fire the issue. I could reproduce the error
>>>>> with
>>>>> lfs-7.5-rc1 as the host, by removing libgmp.la.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, neither Debian nor Arch provide those .la files. I have not
>>>>> checked
>>>>> Fedora yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure what should be done. If users accept to install libgmp-dev,
>>>>> libmpfr-dev, libmpc-dev on their host, the easiest would be to completely
>>>>> remove the build of those packages for gcc-pass1. I'll try that. This
>>>>> would
>>>>> imply that the host requirement be augmented with both libraries _and_
>>>>> headers
>>>>> checks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, maybe just a note telling to remove the .la files (completely
>>>>> removing them gives the cleanest build), at least for the course of the
>>>>> build?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, on my system I have /usr/lib/libmpfr.la which contains
>>>> dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libgmp.la'.
>>>>
>>>> If we add the following to the host system requirements, would that be
>>>> enough?
>>>>
>>>> [ -e /usr/lib/libmpfr.la ] && [ ! -e /usr/lib/libgmp.la ] &&
>>>> echo "libgmp is missing"
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to hold off releasing 7.5 until we get this settled.
>>>>
>>>> -- Bruce
>>>>
>>> I think it is the idea of the fix, except that the libs may be in /usr/lib64
>>> (as in Slackware64). The message should be changed though, since libgmp.so
>>> might be installed without libgmp.la. Do not know exactly what to say:
>>> "please
>>> install a package with libgmp.la, or remove libmpfr.la" (too long...)
>>
>> Hmm. How about:
>>
>> if [ $(ls /usr/lib*/lib{mpfr,gmp,mpc}.so|wc -l) != 3 ]; then
>> echo one of lib{mpfr,gmp,mpc}.so is missing
>> fi
>>
>> -- Bruce
>>
>
> We have to test .la files... What about:
> case "/usr/lib*/libmpfr.la,/usr/lib*/libgmp.la" in
> *a,) echo libgmp.la is missing ;;
> esac
Some users delete .la files. If the .so files are present, then it
shouldn't matter if the .la files are there or not.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
