On 2020-06-14 10:49 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On 6/14/20 8:35 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-06-14 at 15:15 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > > I am currently testing whether moving iana-etc before gcc may allow > > > tests to pass, as reported by Joe Locash. If so, I'll commit it. > > > > > > > Hmm, having iana-etc does not change anything to the > > "22_locale/time_get/..." failures, and there is still one > > failure in experimental/net/internet/resolver, even with a real > > /etc/host installed! > > Some details about the 22_locale/time_get/..." failures in gcc's > libstdc++ tests. > > They all revolve around two files in the same way: > > libstdc++-v3/testsuite/22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc > libstdc++-v3/testsuite/22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/2.c > > They both do: > > iterator_type is_it20(iss); > tm time20; > errorstate = good; > tim_get.get_time(is_it20, end, iss, errorstate, &time20); > VERIFY( time20.tm_sec == time_bday.tm_sec ); > VERIFY( time20.tm_min == time_bday.tm_min ); > VERIFY( time20.tm_hour == time_bday.tm_hour ); > VERIFY( errorstate == ios_base::eofbit ); > > The failure is in the last VERIFY macro. > > I've tried to trace the logic of the tim_get.get_time function, but it's > complicated. > > If that last VERIFY is commented out or changed to !=, then all the > time_get failures go away.
It's GCC PR71367: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367 -- Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
