On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:35:17 +0000 Ken Moffat wrote: > When you've got to the end, it's usually best to *wait* for advice, > repeating the build without understanding the problem is not a > reliable way to get better results!
Yes thats correct. But i has some error message in build process, and so im was worried is really all good. So i has started new. > As you guessed, separate boot partitions can give problems with > grub2. In my case (also with separate /boot partitions) I have a > directory 'boot' on the boot partition (i.e. /boot/boot when > everything is mounted) containing a symlink called 'grub' pointing > to ../grub. I think that I created it (with /boot mounted, so from > the host system) using > mkdir /boot/boot > ln s ../grub /boot/boot I has make so. mount /dev/sda3 /mnt/lfs mkdir /mnt/lfs/boot mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/lfs/boot Its free the root Partion have mounted with handbook of lfs. So was correct Path /boot/grub. That is why i not understand the message from grub, because Path was correct, Kernel was correct with name. Has not understand so i think it a build error. > I think this is necessary because grub installed its many > components into /boot/grub and assumes that is where they should be > when it needs them. Yes Regards Silvio -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
