On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:18 -0500, alex lupu wrote: > 2. In general, if grub 0.97 could be used here, does it have limitations in > other complicated configurations, present and in the foreseeable future?
If I remember correctly, grub1 can't be built on a 64-bit system. That is, it can boot one just fine, but it can't be compiled without using a 32-bit compiler. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
