----- Original Message -----
From: Michael E. Maher <mich...@maheronline.co.uk>
To: Mike Johnston <mkejohns...@yahoo.com>
Cc: LFS Support List <lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:40 -0800, Mike Johnston wrote:
> Any ideas from this? I really appreciate your help on this.
>Everything looks good there, sorry I can think what might be wrong.
>There looks like another thread on this list that is a similar issue,
>does anything there help?
Ok so I found the thread you mentioned (I think). It turns out if I rename the
ports eth2 and eth3
it works perfectly. I can switch either port to the eth2/eth3 or eth3/eth2 and
all is good.
So what's the problem with naming with eth0/eth1 and just moving them around???
Any ideas? Kinda of crazy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
