----- Original Message -----
From: Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]>
To: LFS Support List <[email protected]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
--- Em sex, 11/1/13, Mike Johnston escreveu:
> De: Mike Johnston
> Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
> Para: "Thomas de Roo", "LFS Support List"
> Data: Sexta-feira, 11 de Janeiro de 2013, 10:28
...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Thomas de Roo
> To: Mike Johnston
> LFS Support List
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 8:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
>
> On 01/09/13 13:32, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > From: Michael E. Maher
> > To: Mike Johnston
> > Cc: LFS Support List
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 3:55 AM
> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:03 -0800, Mike Johnston
> wrote:
> >> I'm using LFS 7.2 all built and is running almost
> fine.
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get multiple nics with stable
> names. I have the
> >> 70-persistent-net.rules file set matching on mac
> addresses. The
> >> problem is the file never seems to take effect.
> >>
> >>
> >> Any ideas what might cause this? Anything in the
> kernel need to
> >> configured specifically?
> >>
> >>
> >> I had this working beautifully on LFS 6.3
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
...
> > # net device e1000e
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:a4:9d:4f", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
> ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
> >
> > # net device e1000e
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:a4:9d:4e", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0",
> ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
...
> >Have you tried to put the rule for eth0 first, and the
> rule for eth1 second?
>
> >Groet,
> >Thomas
>
>
> I have tried that with no difference HOWEVER, if i change it
> to eth2 and eth3 it works and it will work in any order with
> either mac address. Why would eth2/eth3 work and not eth1
> and eth0 is the question.
>Is this a virtual machine?
>[]s,
>Fernando
It is not a VM. It's a supermicro motherboard with two NICs.
Thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
