--- Em sex, 11/1/13, Mike Johnston escreveu: > De: Mike Johnston > Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules > Para: "Thomas de Roo", "LFS Support List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 11 de Janeiro de 2013, 10:28
... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Thomas de Roo > To: Mike Johnston > LFS Support List > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 8:14 AM > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules > > On 01/09/13 13:32, Mike Johnston wrote: > > From: Michael E. Maher > > To: Mike Johnston > > Cc: LFS Support List > > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 3:55 AM > > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules > > > > > > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:03 -0800, Mike Johnston > wrote: > >> I'm using LFS 7.2 all built and is running almost > fine. > >> > >> > >> I'm trying to get multiple nics with stable > names. I have the > >> 70-persistent-net.rules file set matching on mac > addresses. The > >> problem is the file never seems to take effect. > >> > >> > >> Any ideas what might cause this? Anything in the > kernel need to > >> configured specifically? > >> > >> > >> I had this working beautifully on LFS 6.3 > >> > >> > >> Thanks in advance, ... > > # net device e1000e > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", > ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:a4:9d:4f", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", > ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1" > > > > # net device e1000e > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", > ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:a4:9d:4e", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", > ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0" ... > >Have you tried to put the rule for eth0 first, and the > rule for eth1 second? > > >Groet, > >Thomas > > > I have tried that with no difference HOWEVER, if i change it > to eth2 and eth3 it works and it will work in any order with > either mac address. Why would eth2/eth3 work and not eth1 > and eth0 is the question. Is this a virtual machine? []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page