On 07/05/2018 11:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
On 07/05/2018 02:48 PM, Frans de Boer wrote:
On 06/30/2018 01:29 PM, Hazel Russman wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 01:25:29 -0400
Michael Shell <li...@michaelshell.org> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:06:00 +0800
Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> wrote:
Now I only use "initrd" directive to update CPU microcode and fix the
buggy ACPI DSDT of my laptop (another sad story).
.........
And as there now seems to be several people who suffer with the
ACPI DSDT driver bug, you guys should make sure upstream is aware
of the problem, if they aren't already.
...........
Cheers,
Mike
--
I did a git bisect on my system, but I couldn't make much sense of
the result. The commit it finally settled on didn't seem to have
anything to with acpi.
[quote]
Bisecting: 2 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[9af9b94068fb1ea3206a700fc222075966fbef14] x86/cpu/AMD: Handle SME
reduction in physical address size
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[33c2b803edd13487518a2c7d5002d84d7e9c878f] x86/mm: Remove
phys_to_virt() usage in ioremap()
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps)
[7744ccdbc16f0ac4adae21b3678af93775b3a386] x86/mm: Add Secure Memory
Encryption (SME) support
[unquote]
I sent the result to the kernel acpi development list but never got
an answer. If someone else on this list wants to try, I can send him
my complete bisect logs.
--
Hazel
This quite frustrating. After recompiling, following the book to the
letter, I still get a frozen LFS system.
One thing I do note however is that the freezing always occurs after
systemd has detected that it is on a virtual machine. A number of
error messages is send, but due to ratelimiting I can't see them
because they are suppressed.
I had even rebuild everything with systemd-232, and that worked as
before. But after 232, things started to behave strange. Now way to
debug systemd, whatever I do....
Help?
I don't mean to be pedantic, but I really don't think you would run
into these types of problems using System V. Why not try that?
-- Bruce
Hi Bruce,
With System V there is - of course - no problem. The thing is that
systemd - if it runs well - is somewhat easier to use because of the use
of .service files. I also noticed that some packages are only shipping
.service(.in) files and have abandon the use of sysVinit files. Combined
with the fact that most distributions have embraced systemd as their
primary or only init system let me believe that we are stuck with this
piece of ever growing mutation. And as LFS is a teaching ground, it
should - however reluctant - incorporated this too.
Also, the goal is that someone fire-up their basic hardware with a LFS
born OS, but for testing or use in VM's development is nowadays mostly
within the VM realm.
Regards,
Frans
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
