On 07/25/2011 07:41 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 13:01:13 (CEST), Luca Barbato wrote: > >> --- >> src/index | 8 ++++++-- >> src/shame | 11 ++++++----- >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/index b/src/index >> index 128fb57..58987b1 100644 >> --- a/src/index >> +++ b/src/index >> @@ -16,8 +16,12 @@ on your choice of configuration options. If you use >> Libav or its constituent >> libraries, you <b>must</b> adhere to the terms of the license in question. >> You can find basic compliance information and get licensing help on our >> <a href="legal.html">license and legal considerations page</a>. >> -Note that if you violate our license terms, we will track you down, list >> -you on our <a href="shame.html">Hall of Shame</a> and eventually sue you. >> +Please note that because of GPL §4 (or LGPL §8), violating o >> license > > Surely there are proper entities for the § sign.
§ > moreover, it should read 'violating _our_ license'. (not 'o license'). > >> +will terminate your rights to our work. However, we are willing to work >> +with you to a solution should such a situation occur. > > to find a soltion > >> +License violations are managed on our <a >> href="http://bugzilla.libav.org">bug >> +tracker</a> and we keep a page with the unresponsive >> +<a href="/shame">violators</a> to make the public aware of them. >> </p> >> <p> >> diff --git a/src/shame b/src/shame >> index fa68899..a7abc21 100644 >> --- a/src/shame >> +++ b/src/shame >> @@ -4,15 +4,16 @@ LIBAV_LEGAL_NAVBAR >> <p> >> This is a list of projects or companies violating Libav's license. The >> list >> -is part of an effort to get them to comply with the licensing terms by >> shaming >> -them in public. >> +is part of an effort to get the public aware of them. > > does 'to raise public awareness' sound better to native speakers? yes. -Justin _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
