On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Babic, Nedeljko <nba...@mips.com> wrote: > Your list is more or less correct in general terms. > > We agree that inline assembler is a problem for clang (and other compilers > that > do not support it). > > However, for our architecture and code that we are delivering for this project > rest of the points from the list are simply not valid (mips doesn't have auto > increment, there are no function calls in inline assembly, etc.). > > Anyhow, currently we did not plane resources for this project to support > two versions of the same code (inline assembly and external asm). > > Until we obtain those resources sending patches will be on hold.
Might I suggest in the future involving yourself in the project and asking questions *before* embarking on a massive project to write code, not after? It tends to save much time, headaches, and money. Jason _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
