I think that there is some misunderstanding here. We were asked (from our customers) to optimized some codecs from FFmpeg and are in process of submitting patches to FFmpeg maintainers (some of them are already integrated).
Few weeks ago I was contacted by Mr. Biurrun (Mr. Rullgård was in cc) and asked to submit patches to libav also. We though that supporting libav project (in addition to ffmpeg) would not require significant effort (as parts of the code that we optimized are the same in both projects) and accepted to do so. But, in initial comments on first submissions serious changes of the optimized code were required. As resources were not planned for such additional work we must delay submissions to libav project until we get additional resources. - Nedeljko ________________________________________ From: libav-devel-boun...@libav.org [libav-devel-boun...@libav.org] on behalf of Diego Biurrun [di...@biurrun.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 17:30 To: libav development Cc: Lukac, Zeljko Subject: Re: [libav-devel] Optimization of decoders for MIPS. On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0000, Babic, Nedeljko wrote: > > Anyhow, currently we did not plane resources for this project to support > two versions of the same code (inline assembly and external asm). What do you mean by "two versions"? There is no need to support both inline and external asm ... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
