On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/01/13 15:34, Anton Khirnov wrote:> > > ????: > > // those are very lavc-specific, but quite useful so i'm unsure > > // what to do about them. pkt_pts might potentially be replaced > by pts, > > // since pts is currently not used for anything useful when > decoding > > // but pkt_dts is apparently also useful when there is no pts > > int64_t pkt_pts; > > int64_t pkt_dts; > > int64_t reordered_opaque; > > I wonder who uses reordered_opaque, the other two have some uses indeed. > > I do. I find it useful for passing various extra info for a packet through the decoder. (Which is its intended usecase AFAIK). Please keep it around if possible.
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
