On 09/01/13 17:28, Vladimir Pantelic wrote: > Luca Barbato wrote: > >>> ????: >>> // those are very lavc-specific, but quite useful so i'm unsure >>> // what to do about them. pkt_pts might potentially be >>> replaced by pts, >>> // since pts is currently not used for anything useful when >>> decoding >>> // but pkt_dts is apparently also useful when there is no pts >>> int64_t pkt_pts; >>> int64_t pkt_dts; >>> int64_t reordered_opaque; >> >> I wonder who uses reordered_opaque, the other two have some uses indeed. > > I am using it. And I still find it useful to have a way to attach a user > provided > reference to a frame.
Are you happy with it? should we replace with an union type that can fit a pointer, a large int and a double? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
