On 09/01/13 09:24, Andreas Öman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 08/01/13 15:34, Anton Khirnov wrote:> >>> ????: >>> // those are very lavc-specific, but quite useful so i'm unsure >>> // what to do about them. pkt_pts might potentially be replaced >> by pts, >>> // since pts is currently not used for anything useful when >> decoding >>> // but pkt_dts is apparently also useful when there is no pts >>> int64_t pkt_pts; >>> int64_t pkt_dts; >>> int64_t reordered_opaque; >> >> I wonder who uses reordered_opaque, the other two have some uses indeed. >> >> > I do. I find it useful for passing various extra info for a packet through > the decoder. > (Which is its intended usecase AFAIK). Please keep it around if possible.
Agreed _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
