On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Justin Ruggles
<justin.rugg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/19/2014 01:22 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:23:58PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For release branches, we currently don't have any FATE Farm. It would
>>>> be great to have something like that, but as far as I understand, it
>>>> is a lot of effort to setup FATE for release branches, which is really
>>>> a shame.
>>>
>>> Huh? It's just a matter of changing a Git URL..
>>
>> I wasn't aware that it's that easy, please go ahead and change fate to
>> also cover the release branches.
>>
>
> We also need to be careful about removing or changing existing tests in ways
> that will break release branches. An alternative would be to copy all of the
> reference samples to a separate dir when a release branch is made and use
> that instead.
That's what we've been doing since release/0.7:
>> rsync -vaLW rsync://fate-suite.libav.org
samples r/o access to Libav's samples collection
fate-suite r/o access to Libav's fate-suite
fate-suite-10 r/o access to Libav's fate-suite for Libav 10
fate-suite-9 r/o access to Libav's fate-suite for Libav 9
fate-suite-0.8 r/o access to Libav's fate-suite for Libav 0.8
fate-suite-0.7 r/o access to Libav's fate-suite for Libav 0.7
We also adjust the target "fate-rsync" in tests/Makefile for release branches.
--
regards,
Reinhard
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
