> The remark you mention there was not a review, but rather a complaint that
> the submitted patch was not easy enough to diff against the FFmpeg version.
> Cleanup by other contributors from libav was squashed in order to have a
> clean version in the history and for review on the ml.  I and others
> gladly rescinded any specific authorship attribution for that.

The author asked specifically to be attributed correctly and this was ignored.
IANAL but this is very dubious from a copyright perspective
attributing changes that the author didn't approve of to him purely
for the sake of having a "clean version in the history".
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to