> The remark you mention there was not a review, but rather a complaint that > the submitted patch was not easy enough to diff against the FFmpeg version. > Cleanup by other contributors from libav was squashed in order to have a > clean version in the history and for review on the ml. I and others > gladly rescinded any specific authorship attribution for that.
The author asked specifically to be attributed correctly and this was ignored. IANAL but this is very dubious from a copyright perspective attributing changes that the author didn't approve of to him purely for the sake of having a "clean version in the history". _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel