On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:47 +0100
Lucas Soltic <lucas.sol...@orange.fr> wrote:

> 
> 
> > Le 27 janv. 2015 à 07:26, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> a écrit :
> > 
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:39:20 -0700
> > Bradley O'Hearne <br...@bighillsoftware.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >>> On Jan 26, 2015, at 8:19 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> I think the problem is rather that you're not even trying to contribute.
> >>> 
> >>> This is an open source project. You have to get involved, not expect
> >>> that "support" will take care of you.
> >> 
> >> I’ve been on this mailing list over three years. Numerous times I’ve 
> >> attempted to engage this list in discussions in hopes of definitively 
> >> understanding FFmpeg at a deeper level, and leaving a discussion trail 
> >> which others traveling the same path which I have could benefit from who  
> >> I’ve inquired about documentation, design and architectural decisions. 
> >> I’ve asked questions about how various X things are accomplished for the 
> >> same reason. I’ve contributed a fully working real-time 
> >> capture-encode-stream app whose code has sat on Github for over a year and 
> >> has been linked to several times on this mailing list. This time, I once 
> >> again tried to find a way I could contribute something to FFmpeg which 
> >> based on the clients I serve, is exactly what FFmpeg needs — and so I 
> >> appealed to the community in hopes of finding others whom it would help as 
> >> well. All of this is directly aimed at contributing. 
> >> 
> >> In all of the cases above, the efforts proved futile (save some of the 
> >> folks I’ve met and good conversations I’ve had a result off-list as a 
> >> result). The very ingrained collective personality of this mailing list is 
> >> a one-trick pony — when you can’t stand toe-to-toe technically, turn the 
> >> turrets on the person, and make the conversation personal. Same thing 
> >> here…avoid the issue, fault the person. If you want a fail-safe formula 
> >> for pushing contributors away, well you’ve got it.
> > 
> > No, no. As I said before, there are barely any developers on this list.
> > I guess people don't like giving tech support (especially for free). If
> > you want to get involved, get on ffmpeg-devel and on the IRC channel.
> > 
> > As for contributing... I haven't seen a single FFmpeg patch from you,
> > and not a single post from you on the ffmpeg-devel list in the last few
> > years (you know... the place where ffmpeg devs actually reading any
> > posts).
> > 
> >> As I stated before…you win. Your worries about threatening FFmpeg by 
> >> bringing its API out of the realm of the propellor-heads and propagating 
> >> clarity and understanding rather than keeping FFmpeg a black art are 
> >> unnecessary. I’ll contribute elsewhere.
> > 
> > Well, you're not contributing in the first place. Your suggested wrapper
> > would have no value for the project either, because it'd be completely
> > Apple locked-in.
> > 
> > If you want to view yourself as a victim of the evil open source
> > conspiracy, you can do that, but please refrain from such stupid
> > allegations. It's quite funny to hear that when I've always argued for
> > API simplification and introducing higher level APIs.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libav-user mailing list
> > Libav-user@ffmpeg.org
> > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
> 
> wm4, you're being awfully demoralizing and narrow minded. 

More than "this project is shit, let's write a wrapper to compensate
for both technical and social issues without even asking the devs
first"?

(Oh yeah, and sorry for my disinterest in Apple tech.)

> This discussion is already by itself a great contribution: giving ideas about 
> what should be improved and pointing out what are FFmpeg weakness. Instead of 
> taking advantage of these you just throw the efforts away. Just the kind of 
> stuff that makes sure you won't get more source code contribution.

Except that it's a storm (or flame) in a bottle, and nobody outside
cares about this discussion. It's not like I'm a FFmpeg developer
either.

_______________________________________________
Libav-user mailing list
Libav-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user

Reply via email to