Fabio Pietrosanti (naif): > Here some notes i collected with a quick review of the source code:
I can see the headlines now... "Cryptography super-group more like a cover band" "Cryptography Boy Band covers Latvian super-group" "Cryptography super-group? More like Milli Vanilli!" or perhaps simply: "SilentCircle's premiere product was outsourced, and based on out-of-date security libraries with known bugs" Finally, just to be clear, I have nothing against re-using code, especially open-source projects that are complimentary. This is exactly what we have done for our work on OSTN/OStel. I do have a problem with people representing software they license from someone else as their own brilliant, weaved-by-the-gods invention. +n -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
