You have to love the reply:  "We've come a long way since the Pentagon
Papers were sidelined by Tricia Nixon's garden wedding party"  ROFLMAO!

SN

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <na...@nadim.cc> wrote:

> Check out this screenshot of the front page of the New York Times right
> now. Unbelievable:
>
> https://twitter.com/kaepora/status/343888967554457600
>
> NK
>
> On 2013-06-09, at 8:17 PM, Matt Johnson <railm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Snowden says he wants asylum in Iceland. Why not go there directly?
> >
> > Going to Hong Kong makes him vulnerable to accusations of working for
> the PRC.
> >
> > None of that makes sense to me, but what do I know. I will watch, and
> learn.
> >
> > --
> > Matt
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Raven Jiang CX <j...@stanford.edu> wrote:
> >> There is a strong resistance against Chinese strong-arming in Hong Kong,
> >> plus I am not sure that it is actually in the interest of the Chinese
> >> government to help the US do anything about this. I think you can make a
> >> case for why it's a better choice, though it is definitely debatable.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9 June 2013 15:10, Sheila Parks <sheilaruthpa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I agree with what you say about Hong Kong
> >>>
> >>> He does say he would like to end up in Iceland
> >>>
> >>> Wonder why he did not go there in the first place
> >>>
> >>> Such an immensely brave and honest person
> >>>
> >>> Sheila
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> At 06:04 PM 6/9/2013, you wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 06/09/2013 04:43 PM, Matt Johnson wrote:
> >>>>> I have to say going to Hong Kong for free speech and safety seems
> like
> >>>>> a very odd choice to me. What was he thinking?
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually, and I think this is pointed out in either the video or an
> >>>> article somewhere, Hong Kong doesn't generally suffer the speech
> >>>> restrictions mainland China does. Sure, they aren't completely free
> but
> >>>> protests and unpopular political speech happen quite frequently and
> are
> >>>> generally well tolerated by the government.
> >>>>
> >>>> Still, I have to wonder why he didn't go somewhere like Iceland. To
> me,
> >>>> that would have been a no-brainer.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anthony
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Anthony Papillion
> >>>> Phone:   1.918.533.9699
> >>>> SIP:     sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
> >>>> iNum:    +883510008360912
> >>>> XMPP:    cypherpun...@jit.si
> >>>>
> >>>> www.cajuntechie.org
> >>>> --
> >>>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> >>>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your
> settings at
> >>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sheila Parks, Ed.D.
> >>> Founder
> >>> Center for Hand-Counted Paper Ballots
> >>> Watertown, MA  02472
> >>> 617 744 6020
> >>> DEMOCRACY IN OUR HANDS
> >>> www.handcountedpaperballots.org
> >>> she...@handcountedpaperballots.org
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> >>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings
> at
> >>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> >> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings
> at
> >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
> > --
> > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>



-- 

Shava Nerad
shav...@gmail.com
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing 
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to