On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:42:02PM -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote: > My suspicion is that either they were hacked (and had their key > stolen), or that they were ordered to shutdown and recommend > Microsoft's (presumably backdoored) BitLocker as a replacement. > BitLocker's enterprise documentation makes me *incredibly* > suspicious that it is susceptible to monitoring by third-parties.
If it's the latter, and I'll certainly grant that's a possibility, then it was a short-sighted move on the part of whoever's responsible, since TrueCrypt's source is available to anyone who wants to restart the project elsewhere. Someone will, and they'll use the results of the just-completed code audit to improve it. (And yes, I presume BitLocker is quite thoroughly backdoored.) > Pardon my tinfoil hat. Not a problem: the bar for "tinfoil hat" has been raised considerably in the last year. ---rsk -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
