Yeah, them speell checkers will get you every time. Keep up the great work and I hope you have effect and can control all the mistake everybody else makes too. Goat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: "goat!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Man, I love this guy. He is saying exactly what some >> of us have been saying for a long while now. The key >> will be to mitigate the things he see coming, >> and imitating how the soviet population got by to >> a great extent is the key, and what some of us have been >> trying to accomplish and pointing out why others should be >> doing the same thing. Unless you want to be a single >> leaf on the raging sea, it is imperative to to start >> reversing the trend of atomization, and start thinking of >> coming to gather on single properties, as it will be easier for >> a group of people to maintain a household or property (industrial >> property is a good choice in some ways, as is farm land), then >> being atomized. The thing is, that I don't see the trends that got >> us in the position we are in in this country as an accident, >> put has been planned to leave us very vulnerable so we can >> more easily be conquered and subdued. > > Goat, I'm sorry. You really _do_ have to work on your word usage and your > spelling. Here we have a major mistype that completely changes what I hope > you meant. I put underscores around the word in question. > >>From your text: > >> as it will be easier for >> a group of people to maintain a household or property (industrial >> property is a good choice in some ways, as is farm land), _then_ >> being atomized. > > I hope you meant: > >> as it will be easier for >> a group of people to maintain a household or property (industrial >> property is a good choice in some ways, as is farm land), _than_ >> being atomized. > > Both will pass any spelling or grammar checker on any computer I know of. > But _then_ and _than_ are very different words even if they sound almost > alike in some accents. > -- > Ward Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
