Jesu fookin' Kristos, I have to assume you either didn't read my text or actually don't fucking know the difference between the two words.
Goat, you're plonked. I'll see you in Hell (where I'll probably be sentenced to edit your posts). -- Ward Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] These histrionics were probably unnecessary, since there was no reason to think anybody would be watching us with more than casual interest until I made my first move to follow Buchanon's trail, in London. Still, somebody might check back this far later, and I always feel that if you're going to play a part, you might as well play it all the way, at least in public -- and it's hard to tell what's public and what isn't, these electronic days. Donald Hamilton, _The Devastators_, 1965 -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "goat!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yeah, them speell checkers will get you every time. > Keep up the great work and I hope you have effect and can control all > the mistake everybody else makes too. > Goat > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: "goat!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Man, I love this guy. He is saying exactly what some > >> of us have been saying for a long while now. The key > >> will be to mitigate the things he see coming, > >> and imitating how the soviet population got by to > >> a great extent is the key, and what some of us have been > >> trying to accomplish and pointing out why others should be > >> doing the same thing. Unless you want to be a single > >> leaf on the raging sea, it is imperative to to start > >> reversing the trend of atomization, and start thinking of > >> coming to gather on single properties, as it will be easier for > >> a group of people to maintain a household or property (industrial > >> property is a good choice in some ways, as is farm land), then > >> being atomized. The thing is, that I don't see the trends that got > >> us in the position we are in in this country as an accident, > >> put has been planned to leave us very vulnerable so we can > >> more easily be conquered and subdued. > > > > Goat, I'm sorry. You really _do_ have to work on your word usage and your > spelling. Here we have a major mistype that completely changes what I hope > you > meant. I put underscores around the word in question. > > > >>From your text: > > > >> as it will be easier for > >> a group of people to maintain a household or property (industrial > >> property is a good choice in some ways, as is farm land), _then_ > >> being atomized. > > > > I hope you meant: > > > >> as it will be easier for > >> a group of people to maintain a household or property (industrial > >> property is a good choice in some ways, as is farm land), _than_ > >> being atomized. > > > > Both will pass any spelling or grammar checker on any computer I know of. > > But > _then_ and _than_ are very different words even if they sound almost alike in > some accents. > > -- > > Ward Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
