On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Marc Lehmann <schm...@schmorp.de> wrote: >> >> in loop_fork() you call > > Hm, right. > > Can you try the CVS version of libev? That one doesn't rely on this check > anymore, and will probably just work (the test in the signal handler relied > on int being atomic and was actually a temporary bug workaround, which the > cvs version should fix)
Yes, it appears to be fixed now. _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
