On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > is there a list of pending issues holding up adding libusb-1.0 support to the > master libftdi tree ? if there's a TODO or something that i can help tackle, > that would work. having one released version to deal with would make my life > a lot easier as ive finished porting urjtag to libusb-1.0 already. > > (please cc me as i dont receive posts to this list)
Please refer to the following post from Thomas. http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2010/msg00364.html Todo: 1. Rename the library and header file. (not yet) 2. Remove autoconf support (resolved). And this one: http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2010/msg00257.html So I will think it is not really a merge, but rather to make the two libraries can co-exist (like libusb and libusb-1.0). But I understand this may cause some extra work for project like urjtag. -- Xiaofan -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
