> then there would be no reason at all for the public ftdi.h to include usb.h or
> libusb.h.

As it has been the case for a long time, this means that the proposed
change is an ABI compatibility break, as some softwares may already
use this structure...

--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]   

Reply via email to