On Thursday, September 02, 2010 02:06:07 Michael Plante wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> why is having libftdi-1.x require > >> libusb-1.x isnt a big deal for distros ? we have those packages in > >> Gentoo right now. > > Well, it's good to see your request was finally granted this past month: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304149 > > Could you elaborate on why a slot won't work for libftdi-1 too?
i never said it isnt possible. i did say it's more work and i'm questioning whether it's necessary for libftdi to put this work on all distros. i havent seen points yet that indicate replacing libftdi-0.x with libftdi-1.x require changing the API/ABI in a backwards-incompatible way. do you have examples for me ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
