Uwe, On Friday, 30. September 2011 12:45:14 Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Xiaofan> Yes. > > > We should at least identify the functions that access the ftdi context > direct. Then perhaps some thought need to be made if all these functions > are really usefull/nescessary. > > We(I) could then try to do something similar like for EEPROM settings. > Then we could perhaps mark the opld functions obsolet. I propose to do > that before the 1.0 release.
If it doesn't take you too much time, then go ahead. Remember: The original goal of libftdi 1.x was to port it to libusb 1.x. That goal is already reached. Still it's a good opportunity to improve the API. Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
