On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Thomas Jarosch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 4. October 2011 14:25:19 Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Thomas Jarosch >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If it doesn't take you too much time, then go ahead. >> > >> > Remember: The original goal of libftdi 1.x was to port it >> > to libusb 1.x. That goal is already reached. Still it's >> > a good opportunity to improve the API. >> >> Since the goal is already reached, maybe it is good to >> release 1.0 first and then further improve the API in >> 1.1 or 2.0. > > Let's see what Uwe comes up with, then we still can decide. > I just like to see a 1.0 release happening this year (Xmas > present anyone?).
Sorry to rehash this thread. But now that libusb project has finally released libusb-1.0.9 and the fork libusbx project has released libusbx-1.0.11 and progressed quite nicely, the main hurdle of using libftdi-1.0 under Windows is now gone. Shall we plan the libftdi-1.0 formal release from now on? libusbx roadmap: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/libusbx/roadmap 1.0.13 will bring libusb-win32 driver (including filter driver) support. In that case, people can keep using the original FTDI driver and just install libusb-win32 device filter driver on top to use libftdi-1.0, no need to replace FTDI driver with winusb. -- Xiaofan -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
