Frank Reichert wrote:
I wouldn't trust Henry Waxman if he said the sky was blue. If Congress didn't pass it, how could Bush have gotten a copy - with the signatures of Hastert and the president pro tem of the Senate - to sign?
If this were true, the liberal news media would have been all over the story. I have yet to hear of an actual impeachable offense Bush has committed. Sure, there are policies of his I can't stand, but to speak of impeachment or "ouster" is a bit much.
Doug Friedman
>
> How many impeachable offenses must he commit before he is ousted?
>
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/180306bushsigns.htm
> <http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/180306bushsigns.htm>
>
>
> Bush Signs Bill That Didn't Pass Congress
>
> Wilfully violates Constitution and places himself above the law again
>
> *Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 18 2006
> <http://www.prisonplanet.com/index.html>*
> *
> *
> In an amazing development that has received almost no media
> attention, mainstream or alternative, President Bush again placed
> himself above the law and wilfully violated the Constitution by
> signing into law a bill that didn't pass both Houses of Congress.
> According to representative Henry Waxman, Bush signed into law a
> version of the Budget Reconciliation Act that didn't pass
> Congress. The discrepancy between the version Bush signed and the
> actual bill that passed equates to a value of $2 billion.
> Bush knew he was directly violating the Constitution and
> effectively acting as a despot because he received a call from
> the Speaker of the House before signing the bill, warning him
> that it had not been passed.
Crush! Zap! Destroy! Junk e-mail trembles before the might of Windows Live(tm) Mail beta. Windows Live(tm) Mail beta
_______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
