Good morning Doug!
Douglas Friedman wrote to Frank Reichert...
I wouldn't trust Henry Waxman if he said the sky was blue. If Congress
didn't pass it, how could Bush have gotten a copy - with the signatures
of Hastert and the president pro tem of the Senate - to sign?
I sort of understand your propensity to discredit Wasman. On the
other hand however, I don't have much sympathy for the Shrub
Regime either, whether telling the truth, or pulling shenanigans
that circumvent the checks and balances of the Federal
government. At least some of the allegations might have some
validity, particularly whether or not the bill in question really
did actually pass both houses in Congress.
If this were true, the liberal news media would have been all over the
story. I have yet to hear of an actual impeachable offense Bush has
committed. Sure, there are policies of his I can't stand, but to speak
of impeachment or "ouster" is a bit much.
The so-called 'liberal media' wouldn't necessarily touch an issue
that might be better served to ignore if that was to the benefit
of the globalist vision of conforming to global standards and
perhaps enforcement. The Shrub's neo-conservative don't back off
in supporting just such an agenda, and the liberal press has been
onboard this same agenda for decades.
In fact, it's interesting you just brought this up. I just
finished reading a new book that will obviously become enormously
popular in the coming months leading up to the next national
election for US President. The book is titled: "Hillary vs.
Condi".
Admittedly, there are factual material presented that I can
likely support, that Condi Rice would be the ONLY GOP candidate
who might have a prayer of a chance of defeating Hillary Rodham
Clinton, should she be nominated during the 2008 Democrat Primary
as the Democratic candidate. There are a variety of reasons that
the author brings up, such as 55% of Americans would consider
voting for a woman for the office of President of the United
States, and that Condi Rice would be the post candidate over
Hillary for becoming just such, namely that if elected, she would
end the decades racial division that has existed in America since
the early 1960s. That I have to agree with, and if that were the
only stipulation, then I might go onboard and support it as such.
But the author goes much further than this. Now he is talking in
terms of Condi's experience on the world stage as an
internationally acclaimed globalist that understands how America
needs just this sort of leadership in the coming years of the
21st century. In other words, and extrapolation of the current
Shrub Regime's ideal of 'global law' will continue.
My suggestion to you might be, if you have NOT read this book, do
so now before first replying to my fears. I am convinced that
there will be a real effort on the part of the GOP neo-cons, to
draft Condi Rice, particularly if Hillary Clinton becomes the
leading Democratic candidate for office during the 2008 State
Primary processes. The book points out honestly that the GOP has
no one, no one at all, who could hope to prevail against Hillary
Clinton for the reasons that I just mentioned above, other than
drafting Condi Rice.
In my judgement anyway, that isn't much of an answer.
And, to answer your concerns, the Liberal News Media would love
just such a race, since there isn't really any major difference
between the likely objectives of Hillary Clinton, or Condi Rice,
and it will be, simply put, the entire game plan played all over
again to an American audience that would rather watch the Super
Bowl play out than studying and understanding the underlying
issues confronting US foreign policy, and how we got into this
stinking mess in the first place.
Kindest regards,
Frank
_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
Libnw@immosys.com
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
