About the problem, take a look at this message:
http://lists.autonomo.us/pipermail/libre-fm/2009-April/000238.html
The main problem with making Amarok to {scr,g}obble isn't the
> ws.audioscrobbler.com domain (that could be solved by adding just another
> entry in the hosts file along with post.audioscrobbler.com) but the method
>
> Amarok authenticates against Last.fm.
>
> Thus, Amarok calls auth.getMobileSession -- which, however, was designed for
>
> mobile devices only -- and since libre.fm doesn't support this API method yet,
> Amarok cannot get session keys and it doesn't even get to scrobbling itself.
> On my local instance, I have applied a few ultimately WTFy hacks which enable
>
> Amarok to gobble -- actually, I've only added the getMobileSession method &
> check_mobile_auth which always returns true..
>
>
This makes the patch method difficult, IMHO.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:00, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send Libre-fm mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> I would agree with this approach if someone could be found who is able
> and willing to write the patch.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:31 AM, <marcos.marado at sonae.com
> <http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm>> wrote:
>
> >* Hi there,
> *>*
> *>* On Friday 24 April 2009 01:47:35 Gabriel Saldana wrote:
> *>>* I agree, since I haven't been able to post to libre.fm with Amarok 1.4
> *>>* with the hosts file hack.
> *>*
> *>* I find that odd: I am able to post to libre.fm with Amarok 1.4.10, I had
> the
> *>* idea that it wasn't possible only in Amarok 2...
> *>*
> *>>* And since the latest response from the KDE people has been that they
> *>>* won't implement libre.fm support, the right thing to do is provide
> *>>* ourselves support using the plugin system.
> *>*
> *>* Actually I still think that the best thing would be not to have a plugin
> but a
> *>* patch to add the option to define another server besides the one of
> last.fm .
> *>* IMHO that patch should be written and submitted, and a plugin should be
> just
> *>* a last resort thing, to do if the patch is rejected.
> *>*
> *>* Best regards,
> *>* --
> *>* Marcos Marado
> *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libre-fm mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
>
>
--
Post Tenebras, LUX
"...no sufras
porque ganaremos,
ganaremos nosotros,
los más sencillos
ganaremos,
aunque tú no lo creas,
ganaremos."
Pablo Neruda
'...don't suffer
because we will win
We will win,
the simplest
we will win,
even if you don't believe
we will win'.
Pablo Neruda
_______________________________________________
Libre-fm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
