https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172590
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff | |ice.org --- Comment #1 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Alberto Dietze from comment #0) > "AlmaLinux OS 10 has followed Red Hat’s decision to ship x86-64-v3 optimized > binaries by default, but we will also provide an additional x86-64-v2 > architecture, allowing users on that older hardware to continue to receive > security updates for another 10 years." > > Starting from that, I understand that somewhere in the code there is a > "baseline" file that establishes what are the basic features, but if this > will be possible to extend the v2 architecture, why can't we do also for v1? > If it is just a topic of "flags", and it is not about compatibilities with > other softwares, why can't we support an old flag cpu? In this way possibly > a lot of old pc in communities will be just "dismissed" as "old", increasing > the wasting topics about tech devices. I suspect there is a misunderstanding. The paragraph you quoted was me quoting AlmaLinux devs. AlmaLinux is the "we" providing an additional x86-64-v2 architecture, not LibreOffice. So when LibreOffice bumps the Linux build platform baseline next time, it can adopt the x86-64-v2 AlmaLinux variety. On your old Mac, can't you run a distro that supports x86-64-v1 and use the packaged LibreOffice? I believe Arch Linux is an option as it seems you want to run the latest and greatest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
