https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172590
--- Comment #4 from Alberto Dietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #3) > No, that's not what I said. When the time comes to bump our build baseline > to AlmaLinux 10, we will benefit from AlmaLinux's decision to offer > alternative binary packages supporting x86-64-v2. In the same way as in the > AlmaLinux 9 baseline bump, LibreOffice will not be providing anything less > or anything more, it is just the TDF-produced builds being tied to the > minimum required microarchitecture. Oh ok! Thanks for the clarification! It was a my bad misunderstanding/translating of the phrase. That being said, the request is the same, to fulfill the aiming and the scope of LO, to support also previous cpu flags (now and in the future), adding the "cpu flag" at the compiler, to give the freedom to average end users to run LO without any kind of lock-out situation :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
