On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:19 PM, bjoern <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:58:23AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: >> Assuming that those builds can be unzipped and run, if we shoved those >> builds into a git repo we could (potentially) get a similar workflow >> for Windows bibisecting. We'd get a much coarser granularity, but if >> it's something that the devs think could be beneficial, it's probably >> worth the time to set up. >> >> Bjoern - Thoughts here? > > Sounds great, somebody volunteering to do that?
I don't have a windows dev/test box readily available right now, but I don't see any immediate hurdles to creating the repo on another OS. Tommy -- could you do some testing if I take a crack at creating a repo? > After the gerrit migration, I > should be able to set that repo up directly on gerrit.libreoffice.org. +1 I'll see about sticking the repo on a test server for now. --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
