On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:07:26 +0200, Robinson Tryon <bishop.robin...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Florian Reisinger
<flo...@libreoffice.org> wrote:
Hi,

So I am going to create one for Windows, or is there a volunteer with more Git Know-How and maybe a faster upload?

After some conversation on IRC, I think that a Windows bibisect repo
should include the first release in each of our previous release
series (3.6.0, 4.0.0, etc...), but probably not subsequent builds on
the release branches.

I think that you could add just .0 and .7 releases of each old branch (3.3 --> 3.6) but more intermediate release of the current branches (4.0 and 4.1)

One question that comes up often is: Are there enough Windows-only
bugs to make a Windows bibisect tool helpful?

I think that a bibisect Windows tool would help Windows users to become familiar with LibO QA. there's a lot of users who don't know anything about Linux but can do a nice work with Windows.

.... snip ....

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to