Hi there,
Last split out mail:
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 15:28 +0100, Astron wrote:
> Lastly, there's the anchor image from Writer that is also in dire need
> of replacement.
Oooh ! that could be pretty indeed :-)
> What would be great:
> * to know the location of these images in the git repository (sorry, I
> really tried finding them, but there are too many icons)
Not certain, but I tried:
cd sw/ ; git grep ANCHOR
sw/source/ui/utlui/initui.src: BITMAP BMP_FRAME_ANCHOR { FILE = "anchor.bmp"
; };
sw/source/ui/utlui/initui.src: BITMAP BMP_FRAME_DRAG_ANCHOR { FILE =
"danchor.bmp" ; };
Which looks promising, but in fact both of these images are 'missing
icon' icons ;-) I'll add an easy hack to remove them & associated cruft when I
can.
In fact the anchors are in the images attached - which have never been
themed nicely (AFAIK). The second set have been 'improved' a bit, but
its unclear if we use them. It took me about an hour to find the code
(finally from sc/) - the handle object is a:
svx/source/svdraw/svdhdl.cxx
and we create in sc/ with:
rHdl.AddHdl(new SdrHdl(aPos, bNegativePage ? HDL_ANCHOR_TR :
HDL_ANCHOR));
In -theory- we switch between these two different images of anchor at
the cursor blink frequency:
// #98388# when anchor is used take upper left as reference point
inside the handle
pRetval = new ::sdr::overlay::OverlayAnimatedBitmapEx(rPos, aBmpEx1,
aBmpEx2, nBlinkTime);
But I've (personally) never noticed that - perhaps this is because the
images are so similar ? or possibly it is just broken - possibly
OverlayAnimatedBitmapEx is having a bad year.
> * to know what's possible with these images – most importantly: alpha
> transparency?
So - it -looks- as if all that good stuff is possible. It is entirely
possible / probable that we should rip those anchor icons out of their
sets and enlarge / prettify / alpha-blend them.
It'd be great if you could experiment with using alpha / improving the
look of those in your LibreOffice images*.zip ?
> * if someone could remove the additional UI/code
> * if someone would make them themeable (if they aren't
> already/strictly optional)
So - they are already themable, but (I guess) no-one ever knew how to.
There is also a theme-inside-a-theme of the
sal_Bool bIsFineHdl(pHdlList->IsFineHdl());
that switches between the two sets; from 'SetFineHdl' only called from:
void SdrMarkView::SetSolidMarkHdl(sal_Bool bOn)
Which seems to be tied to the 'SimpleHandles' config setting, and I
guess
the other images in that bitmap are in fact the handles we use to edit line
shapes
etc. The question is - do we really want the "simple handles" mode /
configuration
option anymore ? it seems redundant to me and the handles look even less pretty.
Thanks for caring about this detail !
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
<<inline: markers.png>>
<<inline: markers2.png>>
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
