On 03/21/2012 11:37 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
for the case where it is a good idea to check exceptions (e.g. Java UNO bridge, which cannot throw exceptions to the Java side that are not declared on the interface), a runtime catch-all check should be sufficient also.
Yep, guards to catch attempts of throwing anything not allowed by UNO across a bridge are generally in place.
but i wonder if there is any compatibility concern here; i'd be more comfortable if we only removed the exceptions specifications for LO4 and not earlier.
Removing exception specifications from the C++ headers generated by cppumaker and from C++ classes defined in the URE interface should actually be compatible.
Stephan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
