On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > It does *not* add "another _untyped_ return path," at least not any more so > than it would do if throwable types in C++ were restricted to some specific > subset.
Thats exactly the point. In a statically typed environment the default would have needed to be "cant throw anything, unless explicitly stating otherwise". Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
