Sometimes my question is why on the earth one does not make something non-copyable by declaring and not defining private copy constructor and operator= and bothers with the complexity of boost for just this little thing.
Get me right, I love boost, since it simplifies many things, but then noncopyable is not one of those things that were difficult without it. Cheers Fridrich On 29/08/13 21:30, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On 08/29/2013 03:27 PM, Stephan van den Akker wrote: >> Kohei: Can you explain what your change does? I might try that too. > No idea exactly, other than that it avoids the lines that cause error in > my build. I got the idea by reading the offending boost header file > boost/boost/noncopyable.hpp. > > Kohei > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice