On 08/30/2013 09:16 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
Sometimes my question is why on the earth one does not make something non-copyable by declaring and not defining private copy constructor and operator= and bothers with the complexity of boost for just this little thing.
...because boost::noncopyable has become the de-facto standard idiom for this, at least for pre-C++11 code that depends on Boost anyway. [citation missing]
Stephan _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
