Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> ...because boost::noncopyable has become the de-facto standard idiom
> for this, at least for pre-C++11 code that depends on Boost anyway.
>
And it's just one line to parse, ~impossible to screw up subtly, and
declarative rather than implicit. It wins hands-down against any other
option there.

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to