On 06/16/2016 12:59 AM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/16/2016 12:35 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/16/2016 12:02 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >>> I'd rather have it worded as >>> >>>> Parabola's community is democratic in its essence and adhocratic >>>> it its form, >> >> +1 I agree since english is not my native language (i'm brazilian) :P >> >>> I'm not a huge fan of linking to Wikipedia, but it's not a big deal. >> >> Maybe for consensus democracy we could use references such as >> consensualdemocracy website [0] >> >> Otherwise, about Adhocracy, there is book called "Adhocracy" by Robert >> H. Waterman, Jr. It could be useful as reference, however i'm looking >> for another sources about it. >> >> [0] http://www.consensualdemocracy.com/ > > I found it as reference for Adhocracy [0]. I'm reading it now to check > if it is useful as reference. > > [0] https://www.britannica.com/topic/adhocracy
I am coming to the conclusion that we should create both articles (consensus democracy) and (adhocracy) from our own wiki [0]. We could use those references as inspiration (eg. Wikipedia articles) to begin our version. What do you think? [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature