On 06/16/2016 01:27 AM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/16/2016 12:59 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/16/2016 12:35 AM, André Silva wrote: >>> On 06/16/2016 12:02 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >>>> I'd rather have it worded as >>>> >>>>> Parabola's community is democratic in its essence and adhocratic >>>>> it its form, >>> >>> +1 I agree since english is not my native language (i'm brazilian) :P >>> >>>> I'm not a huge fan of linking to Wikipedia, but it's not a big deal. >>> >>> Maybe for consensus democracy we could use references such as >>> consensualdemocracy website [0] >>> >>> Otherwise, about Adhocracy, there is book called "Adhocracy" by Robert >>> H. Waterman, Jr. It could be useful as reference, however i'm looking >>> for another sources about it. >>> >>> [0] http://www.consensualdemocracy.com/ >> >> I found it as reference for Adhocracy [0]. I'm reading it now to check >> if it is useful as reference. >> >> [0] https://www.britannica.com/topic/adhocracy > > I am coming to the conclusion that we should create both articles > (consensus democracy) and (adhocracy) from our own wiki [0]. We could > use those references as inspiration (eg. Wikipedia articles) to begin > our version. What do you think? > > [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu
I've created articles about Consensus democracy [0] and Adhocracy [1] in our wiki to be used in clause 4. Those articles are based on Wikipedia articles ones. Maybe it need more expansion and modifications, but it is a good way to avoid use linking to Wikipedia. What do you think guys? [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Consensus_democracy [1] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Adhocracy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature