> I understood the point, but that is not spyware. It is maybe security vulnerability. Report it to right place. As what you reported here cannot be handled nor solved. -- Louis
Majority of all phones has these it's there by design and none is going to fix that if i ask them.. The only way that i can see to address is to establish more presence and share Hardware Freedom. > OK, and why BSD? That people can make proprietary documentation out of it? -- Louis Because i am not the original author and i have to maintain the original license.. Also a problem that should be addressed in the new license if FSF will make such thing. > As I said previously, I will be glad to register FHF or Free Hardware Foundation for you, US $600 only, it can be done within 1 day. Then you can make decisions in your own foundation. -- Louis If that would help i would already did that, but such approach is not sustainable many people already tried it see http://fhf.it/
You are lobbyist with the conflict of interest. -- Louis
I am not aware of doing lobbying here, my intention is to make the argument that what FSF does is wrong in terms of Hardware freedom and have a civilized discussion about it and what can be done to improve that. > You have spent money,and did not reach your targets, and you have envy towards Purism. -- Louis I didn't spent money i can make calculations to figure out that the model is financially complicated to be sustainable. > But how you talk about it, it is all about money spent on your side and then this talk on the list is the attack against FSF with the purpose to damage Purism. -- Louis None is damaging Purism but themselves, all i did was to make calculations and asked for quotes by expert party on how much it would cost to develop, fabricate and distribute their design and quoted their CEO who said that he would release the hardware files once they reach the development cost which w as not done and Purism or anyone has the option to provide information to adjust the calculation. > It is envy for third party making money. -- Louis How? I don't care about them making money I even support that as technoliberal.. What i am against is them saying that they will release the hardware files and then deciding not to and FSF being fine about that to endorse and actively promote them instead of other Freedom respecting projects or to hold their claims of user-freedom accountable. On 2/1/22 08:30, Jean Louis wrote:
* Jacob Hrbek <krey...@rixotstudio.cz> [2022-02-01 04:59]:Same as in the software the existence of such blobs especially in the modem that on most devices has direct access to ring-0 of the OS which usually canI understood the point, but that is not spyware. It is maybe security vulnerability. Report it to right place. As what you reported here cannot be handled nor solved.I am developing hardware already exclud
ing chip development that i
am still experimenting with.. e.g. currently working on https://github.com/ringerc/openscad-pegboard-peggrid/pull/2 which is licensed under BSD license.OK, and why BSD? That people can make proprietary documentation out of it? I don't mind if it is that license or GPL based, but you are the one that promoted four freedoms, and now you say BSD license, so I am just asking. Do you find it alright that somebody improves the design and than make it again proprietary, not allowing other people to improve on it?and i can't really afford to make complicated projects as FSF will just endorse my competitor to hurt me financially and make it significantly harder to sustain the development like they did with PINE64 to hurt free hardware projects such as https://github.com/Open-Smartwatch, like they do now with Power Progress Community and like they will always do unless something dramatically changes in F
SF and they finally recognize that
Hardware Freedom is critical for Software Freedom and should be fully supported by FSFAs I said previously, I will be glad to register FHF or Free Hardware Foundation for you, US $600 only, it can be done within 1 day. Then you can make decisions in your own foundation.and it's to me really annoying that this whole situation could be avoided by FSF undoing their endorsement of Purism whileYou are lobbyist with the conflict of interest. You have spent money, and did not reach your targets, and you have envy towards Purism. They are maybe reaching targets. But how you talk about it, it is all about money spent on your side and then this talk on the list is the attack against FSF with the purpose to damage Purism. I find that all purely personal issue. It is to be solved within you or you with other company, but is not related to FSF or LibrePlanethighlighting the hardware freedom issues as t
heir whole business
plan is oriented around FSF and Free Software Movement to sell their products which would force them to keep their word and release the hardware files instead of indefinitely saying "oh even after you gave us millions on crowdfunding **NEARLY A DECADE AGO** and we currently hire 40 people to work on our products, ye we also have a notebook now, cool eh? but we still didn't pay for the development of librem 5, help us with that and buy librem 5! 7th batch of at least 1000 devices (close to 3000 now most likely) for the price of 1199 USD per each next week" and making fools off us all.It is envy for third party making money. I welcome companies making money. And now Purism is making money by advertising free software -- I welcome that. I wish they make 100 times more in this year. And if you failed in making money, well, analyze it why and try to find better ways. Is it really the best way for you to r
ecover your lost and invested
money to promote Fears, Uncertainties and Doubts on FSF, Free Software Foundation that allegedly "continuously harms free hardware"? Is it really the best way for you to recover your lost and invested money to promote Fears, Uncertainties and Doubts on Librem, Purism because they are selling hardware and software and making money on it? In other words, focus on your own business, let other organizations develop and prosper. If you have complaint on Librem and you purchased it, revert to manufacturer. Complaints on free software, file issues at appropriate place.And just that FSF won't do anything about this situation and continueThis is also wrong place to directly contact FSF. You have their website, contact them directly. Me I am not affiliated to FSF or I speak for GNU, I state my opinions. I don't see anybody here yet even responding to you from FSF You have their contacts.pa
rticipating on this in good faith assumed fraud (with reasoning provided
beyond a reasonable doubt including quotes from expert 3rd party hardware manufacturers) is depressing especially (not meant as an insult, just what iFor the usage of the word "fraud" -- I am assuring you that FSF is not involved in fraud and that you don't know what you are doing and saying. Depressions are solved elsewhere. I suggest walking around, going into nature, looking and talking to people. I suggest you foster that hardware project as that is one step towards free hardware design, that is what counts. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/
-- Jacob Hrbek, In support of ukraine sovereignty #supportUkraine
publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
