Den 2010-08-29 23:30 skrev Roumen Petrov: > Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2010-08-27 00:27 skrev Roumen Petrov: >>> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>>> Hi Charles, >>>> >>> [SNIP] >>>>> + func_wine_to_win32_path_result="$1" >>>>> + if test -n "$1"; then >>>>> + # Unfortunately, winepath does not exit with a non-zero >>>>> + # error code, so we are forced to check the contents of >>>>> + # stdout. On the other hand, if the command is not >>>>> + # found, the shell will set an exit code of 127 and print >>>>> + # *an error message* to stdout. So we must check for both >>>>> + # error code of zero AND non-empty stdout, which explains >>>>> + # the odd construction: >>> >>> Starting from wine 1.3.1 wine path always output paths: >> >> I have been reading the git source of winepath, and it definitely >> has code paths which output an empty result when certain things >> fail (or rather, a single newline for every path/file it fails to >> convert), so saying that it "always output paths" is not entirely >> correct. >> >>> Lets wine is correctly configured (Z: drive is linked to the file system >>> root): >>> $ cd $WINEPREFIX/dosdevices >>> $ winepath -w `pwd` >>> Z:\%WINEPREFIX_CONVERTED_TO_BACKSLASHES%\dosdevices >>> >>> Now lets remove link: >>> $ rm z: >>> $ winepath -w `pwd` >>> \\?\unix\%WINEPREFIX_CONVERTED_TO_BACKSLASHES%\dosdevices >>> >>> So sed should remove leading //?/unix >> >> This failures are probably comping from inside wine (no mention of >> "//?/unix" or "\\?\unix" in the winepath source), so probably won't >> be seen as failure by winepath. But, if you silently remove \\?\unix, >> then you'll end up with a path that is not complete with a drive >> letter. I think any \\?\unix prefix should be filed as a failure... >> >>>> Peter, are you reading this? Looks like a TODO item for >>>> automake/lib/compile. ;-) >> >> Yes, I'm reading this :-) Patches to compile (and ar-lib) to follow >> when the dust settles... >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> > > FYI http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13265
Ok, I have read that and studied the Wine source a bit more and see where \??\ is transformed into \\?\. So, sorry for the false accusation regarding copy-paste vs. retyping in my other reply... I have now prepared a patch for compile and ar-lib in automake... Cheers, Peter