On 2012.07.03 13:59, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> NB: This patch should be attached as inline
>
> Actually it comes to me as both inline and attachment
Which is exactly what I want.
"Pure" inline is a PITA to work with, because everything's just text and
you never know if there's something of value in there. In case someone
forgot to add "[PATCH]" on the subject line, or used a variation of it
("[FIX]", "Diff:", etc.), there's an increased risk it'll fall through
if not picked up early, which *will* happen. Now, having an identified
attachment makes it a lot easier to avoid that, except for those people
insisting on attaching a .asc for their signatures...
On the other hand, "pure" attachments only seems to be a problem for
people with dumb e-mail clients. For what is worth, at least on Windows,
Thunderbird doesn't have an issue problem displaying and quoting parts
of a text attachment, whether pure attachment or hybrid, as if it was
inline...
> Kind of strange, either something is wrong
> with Gmail or something is wrong with your mail client.
Didn't you send a patch over to libusb-devel recently (the .def
"libusb-1.0.dll" one)? Have you checked whether you had the same issue?
Regards,
/Pete
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
